Dear Author:
The year is 2014. LGBT characters are routinely shown on TV,
and 35-ish states (plus DC) will allow marriage between spouses of the same
gender in the next few weeks. So why am I continuing to see the same tired old
tropes in fiction? I just stopped reading a recent best seller for exactly these reasons.
I’m listing a few “rules” for writing LGBT characters that
should be heeded.
1)
Never refer to a character as a “homosexual” and
especially do not have a character self-identify in that way. Unless the
character performs research in the social sciences, this will never happen. The
same applies to “preference;” the only person who would use that word is a
hater.
2)
Use stereotypes with care. While stereotypes
typically have a grain of truth in them, the fact is that for every gay man who
doesn’t know sports, there’s a Michael Sam. There is no one size fits all
character that can be used. Make your LGBT character as well developed as any
other character in the book.
3)
Lesbian characters are not a straight man’s
fantasy. If they don’t have a legitimate purpose beyond titillation, make them
straight women.
4)
Introduce transgender characters with dignity.
Learn the differences between cross-dressers, drag king/queen, and transgender,
and don’t mix characteristics of each into a single character. Use the pronouns
that your characters would want used about them. If you can’t determine those
pronouns, then you’re not ready to include this character yet.
5)
If your character is in a relationship, know the
status. Does that state have marriage equality or civil unions or nothing? What
does that cover? What does that not cover? I know when I read about a same sex
spouse receiving survivor benefits from Social Security that the author has
made assumptions. It’s not all equal. Granted, things are changing quickly, but
for readers today we will know the difference.
6)
Don’t use a stereotype as a clue to the solution
of the mystery. The hero should never say, “Only a man who knew the words to Funny Girl could have killed Mr. X,
which means that our gay character is the killer.” Don’t give us a list of
over-the-top clues to the orientation of a character to allow us to “solve” the
mystery of the character’s orientation. “Jack is so tidy that he must be gay!”
It was outdated in 1970. It’s ridiculous today.
7)
Gay does not equal weak. I have a black belt in
tae kwon do. So save the tears for someone else. The old gay as victim has been
done to death. It goes back at least 90 years, which means there’s nothing new
you can do with that scenario.
8)
You don’t get to use the word f*****. Ever. If
you have a homophobic character, show us that he or she is homophobic. Don’t
have him/her call another character f***** as your shorthand for homophobic.
When writing, replace it with the n-word and see how great it sounds.
9) 9 And since we’re doing away with the gay as
victim, let’s get rid of the gay as villain role too. No gay person has ever
murdered people to stay in the closet. Trust me, I’ve done research. So this
motive is not realistic. Chad Allen and NPH were forced out of the closet.
Larry Craig, despite being outed, continues to deny it. None of them have ever
killed to keep a secret.
10)
If you don’t know, use Google. Don’t assume that
you know the LGBT experience because you watched Dynasty in the 1980s. Things have changed. Better yet. Ask someone
who is LGBT. Even if you don’t think you do, you know more than one LGBT
person. Chances are they’ll be happy to answer your questions.
I liked this post a lot. I'd add a corollary to the "preference" rule that would prohibit the entire "lifestyle choice" BS. Loathe that phrase. Anyone with common sense and shred of compassion knows how foolish it is to say being gay is a choice. As if any teenager would choose to be mocked and ridiculed daily by choosing to be gay or transgender. Wish that phrase would be abolished in all forma of journalism then it could be eradicated from everyday speech.
ReplyDeleteIn certain instances, a gay villain makes a lot of sense but in the sense of the motive you assign I'll agree it's bogus and inane. I have this guilty pleasure towards one stereotype we encounter in pulp fiction -- the gay pretty boy sadist. These characters at least don't stand for ridicule and beat up on others when they're insulted. But usually do worse than a beating. Still, they often embody the worst of stereotypical views of the 50s and 60s despite being hypermasculine and sporting a rugged physique these men also had limp wrists and outlandish taste in clothes automatically singling them out for being gay or, as the private eye would call him a fairy or pansy.
John, that's why I put "rules" in quotes. There are some instances where it might be reasonable to have a gay villain, but in most cases, it seems as if it's to stay in the closet, which is definitely a stereotype of the 1940s and 1950s.
Delete